In an interview on Caracol Radio today, presidential hopeful Abelardo de la Espriella publicly invited his main rival Ivan Cepeda to take part in a formal presidential debate, underscoring the critical need for open political dialogue ahead of Colombia’s 2026 elections. “Cepeda can’t avoid meeting me in a presidential debate where I will tell the country what I think about him.” And he added that a potential Cepeda government would be “worse than that of Petro.”
Speaking with journalists on one of Colombia’s most influential radio stations, De la Espriella reiterated his call for a face-to-face confrontation of ideas that would allow voters to compare the visions of Colombia’s leading candidates.
De la Espriella also denounced threats against his life and security by “allies” and “friends” of the current government.
Abelardo de la Espriella challenges rival Ivan Cepeda to a debate
During the interview, De la Espriella assured he has all the details and proofs regarding the alleged threats against him: “I cannot give details, but I’m taking all the necessary precautions to keep myself safe,” he said. “They cannot scare me,” he said.
De la Espriella — an attorney, media personality, and founder of the citizen movement Defensores de la Patria — has consistently positioned himself as a candidate who challenges conventional political norms. He has gained momentum in recent polls and frequently emphasizes law and order, economic growth, and a strong stance against corruption, placing him in second position after Ivan Cepeda in the polls.
For his part, Cepeda, the senator and Pacto Historico figure previously expressed reservations about traditional debate formats, suggesting that discussions should prioritize ideas and substantive analysis over personal attacks — a stance that reflects his broader campaign messaging.
A few months ago, as reported by Infobae, De la Espriella highlighted that a structured debate could be governed by rules focused on policy rather than personalities. He underscored that Colombians increasingly view public dialogues as crucial mechanisms to hold leaders accountable.
Today’s invitation builds on months of public challenges between the two camps, with De la Espriella frequently criticizing what he calls a lack of direct engagement from Cepeda in substantive forums.
The importance of public debates
Political analysts say that public debates could have a meaningful impact on voter perceptions, especially as Colombians weigh their options in a polarized political landscape.
With security, inflation, and corruption topping voters’ concerns, a head-to-head exchange might provide decisive clarifications ahead of the ballots. Observers also note that if Cepeda declines the invitation, it could shape early campaign narratives about readiness and openness to public scrutiny.
Experts add that these dynamics will likely influence broader alliances and voter coalitions in the coming weeks.