The Epstein files are on exhibit in New York. In New York City, a temporary library in the Tribeca neighborhood is bringing to light something that often remains buried in digital court records, official statements, and political debate, the enormous documentary record surrounding the case of Jeffrey Epstein and the still-unanswered questions about power, abuse, corruption, and impunity in the United States.
The installation, titled “Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Reading Room,” contains approximately 3.5 million pages of records related to Epstein, the financier and convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on new federal charges.
The documents have been printed, bound, and organized into 3,437 physical volumes weighing more than 17,000 pounds — nearly 8 tons of paper. The exhibition is open to the public through May 21 and requires advance registration.
The project does not function as a traditional library. Members of the public can walk through the space, take in the sheer scale of the archive, review a timeline tracing the relationship between Epstein and Donald Trump, and visit a memorial dedicated to victims and survivors.
However, not everyone is allowed to consult the volumes directly because some documents contain the names of survivors or victims that were not properly redacted. For that reason, access to the full contents is restricted to journalists, government officials, attorneys, and other authorized individuals.
Behind the exhibition is the Institute for Primary Facts, a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on promoting government transparency and public accountability. Its work centers on transforming primary source materials — including court records, official documents, and government archives — into in-person experiences that help the public better understand complex issues of democratic significance.
For the creators, the project is built on a powerful premise: Truth takes on a different dimension when it is no longer just a digital file but a tangible object occupying thousands of shelves. Faced with a mountain of documents weighing several tons, the numbers cease to feel abstract and become an experience that is difficult to forget.
Related: Jeffrey Epstein Was in Colombia in July 2002.
David Garrett and the team seeking to turn court records into a tool for civic education
One of the principal figures behind the project is David Garrett, publicly identified as the lead organizer of the exhibition for the Institute for Primary Facts.
Although limited biographical information is available about Garrett, the publications that have covered the installation describe him as a central figure in both the concept and execution of the project, particularly in its effort to transform the Epstein files into a public experience focused on transparency and collective memory.
Garrett has publicly said that the purpose of the reading room is not to sensationalize the case or indulge public curiosity, but rather to confront visitors with the true scale of the documentary record and the seriousness of the crimes associated with Epstein.
In comments reported by Wired (a well-known American magazine known for thorough reporting and fact-checking, particularly on stories involving institutions, transparency and public policy), he said the evidence assembled in the room relates to one of the most disturbing crimes in modern American history and expressed hope that visitors will leave with a deeper understanding that the rule of law requires active civic engagement and a willingness to demand accountability.
Garrett’s vision appears to stem from a simple idea: In an era of information overload, digital records can become effectively invisible. Millions of pages may be available online without ever being meaningfully read, understood, or discussed. By turning the archive into a physical object, the project seeks to transform the magnitude of the case from an abstract number into a sensory experience.
Reading that millions of pages exist is one thing; walking through rows of bound volumes and seeing how much space that history occupies is something entirely different.
The installation also required extensive verification and logistical coordination. According to Garrett, the timeline documenting Epstein’s relationship with Trump was assembled with the assistance of fact-checkers and attorneys to ensure that every claim could be supported by publicly available records.
Organizers also had to secure a venue willing to host the exhibit and find a printer capable of producing and organizing millions of pages within a relatively short period.
A critical exhibition framed as a transparency initiative rather than a partisan campaign
The reading room bears a deliberately provocative title because it places the names of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein side by side. That choice has generated significant attention, particularly given Trump’s return to the White House and the longstanding public scrutiny of his past social ties to Epstein.
The exhibition includes a detailed timeline documenting the relationship between the two men, from social encounters in Palm Beach and New York to the period when Trump says he distanced himself from Epstein. The timeline brings together photographs, public records, and documented events showing how both men moved within elite social circles for years.
Trump has repeatedly denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and has maintained that he severed ties with him long before the full scope of the scandal became public.
The White House has likewise rejected any suggestion that the president bears responsibility for Epstein’s offenses. According to the organizers, the exhibit is not intended as a legal accusation against Trump but as a documentary exploration of the networks of influence, access, and privilege that surrounded Epstein.
So far, there is no public evidence that the project is funded or directed by high-profile Democratic Party figures or by a specific electoral campaign. What is clear, however, is that the initiative embraces an activist and openly critical perspective toward political and economic elites, particularly regarding how powerful individuals can operate within protected circles for years before facing meaningful legal consequences.
In that sense, the exhibition is best understood not as a traditional partisan effort but as a form of civic pressure. Its creators are using official documents as a starting point for broader public conversations about corruption, abuse of power, institutional failure, and the protection of survivors. Garrett has said he hopes the installation will help spark a stronger public response to such cases.
The Epstein case continues to raise questions about victims, elites, and institutional failure in the US
For years, the Epstein case has served as a troubling symbol of how wealth, social connections, and access to powerful circles can complicate accountability. Epstein was accused of operating a vast sex trafficking network involving girls and young women, and the U.S. Department of Justice has estimated that there may have been more than 1,200 potential victims.
That is why the reading room is more than an archive. It also includes a memorial with candles dedicated to victims and survivors. The space is intended to shift the focus away from political intrigue and toward the human suffering at the center of the case. Visitors can leave messages of solidarity, mourning, and support on a designated wall, reinforcing the idea that every document represents real lives marked by trauma and a continuing search for justice.
This memorial component is essential to understanding the project’s purpose. The installation is not simply a visual display of stacked paper. It seeks to unite three dimensions: The judicial archive, the memory of victims, and the broader question of institutional responsibility. Its central message is that transparency cannot be reduced to releasing documents if those documents are not understood, contextualized, and ultimately used to demand change.
The project also highlights an important ethical tension. On one hand, the Institute for Primary Facts advocates for opening public records and expanding access to information of democratic significance. On the other hand, it recognizes that exposing sensitive details can place survivors at risk, particularly when names were not properly redacted. That concern explains why the general public is not permitted to freely handle or read the complete volumes.
This restriction underscores one of the most difficult challenges in transparency efforts involving sexual abuse: how to ensure accountability without causing further harm to those who have already suffered. The exhibition attempts to strike that balance by allowing visitors to grasp the scale and significance of the archive while limiting direct access to material that could compromise privacy or safety.
A new kind of temporary museum designed to explore corruption, democracy, and public responsibility
The “Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein Memorial Reading Room” reflects a broader trend in documentary activism, in which official records are transformed into public experiences intended to raise civic awareness. Rather than treating corruption as an abstract concept, the project translates it into something concrete: Thousands of books, rows of shelves, and tons of paper representing years of allegations, investigations, institutional shortcomings, and unresolved questions.
The model also invites reflection on the role of journalism, civil society, and transparency organizations in deeply polarized democracies. In the United States, where public debate is often filtered through partisan loyalties, the exhibition relies on primary documents as a foundation for discussion. Its premise is that archives, when carefully organized and made accessible, can help rebuild fact-based public conversations.
For the Institute for Primary Facts, temporary installations like this can serve as emergency civic museums — short-lived, symbolic spaces that emerge during moments of heightened public tension to remind people that democracy depends on memory, vigilance, and participation.
In this case, the Epstein archive becomes a warning about what can happen when social, economic, and political power operate without adequate scrutiny.
The exhibition will remain open only through May 21, but its impact may extend far beyond Tribeca. By turning court records into a physical experience, the project poses a broader question that reaches well beyond the Epstein case: How can a society confront corruption when the truth exists in millions of pages, yet often remains scattered, overwhelming, and emotionally distant from the public?
In that sense, the temporary library in New York does not seek to offer a definitive answer. Its strength lies in doing the opposite, compelling visitors to look, to measure, and to ask why it took so many pages, so many allegations, and so many years for a case of this magnitude to occupy the place it should have held all along in the American public conscience.